The first quarter is closed and the results are in for the magazine industry. Step back and you realize that we are witnessing a conflagration.
From Folio:
Ad pages in consumer magazines dropped 25.9 percent while ad revenue fell 20.2 percent in the first quarter of 2009, according to figures released today by the MPA’s Publishers Information Bureau.
This comes one week after ABM’s Business Information Network reported that ad pages for b-to-b magazines fell 27 percent and revenue dropped 21 percent in January 2009 compared to January 2008.
Percentages can mask the true order of magnitude of change. Absolute numbers tell a better story — they are the currency we use to pay the bills, not percentages.
At the current run rate, magazine revenues will drop $9.5 billion dollars from 2007 to 2009. Ad pages will decline by 400,000. That means editorial pages will decline by something close to 500,000.
It’s astounding.
As I thought about the implications of these numbers today, my attention was caught by a Twitterstream from Laurel Touby.
I first encountered Laurel seven or eight years ago, I think, at an industry event, where she was prowling about wrapped in a distinctive boa pigeonholing anyone that she thought had something useful to say. If you didn’t make the cut, she moved on, abruptly but with a distinctive intensity that helped you reconcile the sudden shift in direction.
She had founded a web service called MediaBistro. It was the original MeetUp for media mavens and she built the business into an energetic community focused around jobs, career and fun. She eventually sold the business to Alan Meckler.
I went down to her office to visit her soon after our first meeting. I wanted to understand what she had done. I asked questions, we talked, and I was struck at how elegant and simple the core of her business was. Give people a way to come together and they will do all kinds of interesting, useful, and, if you’re resourceful, ultimately profitable things.
So she’s got a big dose of WebCred with me and that’s why the Twitterstream today was so fascinating.
[For those of you not familiar with Twitter conventions, you have to read the dialogue from bottom to top.]
There are a lot of magazine people on Twitter, and Laurel’s call for good news got one response:
Her stream of Twitters innocently captures the sadness and misdirection of the magazine world. Money and Kiplinger’s announce new web tools and they hardly touch on the kind of interaction and community that people desire. “[People] want to activate advice online and in their lives,” Laurel says.
When an industry looses $10 billion of revenue, that almost all comes off the bottom line. And to right itself, that industry has to make radical changes to its two biggest assets: human capital and product. The process is wrenching and disruptive.
Look around the blogosphere and the battle big media is getting geared up for is around their content. It’s a valiant last stand at Thermopylae, against the overwhelming force of Google, the clever stealth of Huffington Post.
While that battle is grand and glorious, it doesn’t confront the root of the profound change. That change is captured in the way people are migrating into their social networks online, creating their own content, interacting with groups of their peers, embracing diverse communities that organize around each other.
Magazines at their best do two things. They project authority and they create community. Those two things, done well — and they still can be done well — create powerful environments for advertisers.
Authority and community have dissipated into the online world, lost to the Google web and the Social web.
In the magazine business, our core DNA tells us that to protect our brand we need to control our authority and our community. When we engage our community, we filter and channel. We don’t reflect, we don’t mirror and we don’t embrace.
There are exceptions, the innovators who have moved their business into more diverse and innovative modes. Red7Media, publisher of Folio:, is one example that I’ve followed most closely.
We don’t have any choice, you know. That $10 billion of lost revenue isn’t going to come back, not when the entire economy has shrunk by $2+ trillion. The path to Prosperity will be trod through the current circumstances, as unlikely as it may seem today. Some brands will survive. But it will require reinvention.
{ 1 trackback }
{ 6 comments }
Love your blog Dan, and I also am a big fan of Laurel's . . .she's smart, intuitive, and sees the future.
The magazine business has a number of issues today: they are no longer the ONLY resource, although they build community, it is not an interactive community, print advertising is not particularly well understood for its return,
and too many publishers still only see the magazine as the center/and be all/end all of their media/community activities.
Hope is not lost, once the magazine brands factor in all aspects of a community, and find ways to connect, engage, entertain, help foster commerce, and through all channels. Many will recognize/survive, but sadly, many will not.
Nicely put, David.
Good post Dan. It is hard to get your (or at least my) head around the seismic shifts that are under way. I think about what I'd do if I were running one of these big media companies right now and have a hard time coming up with answers that are both sensible and have a prayer of working.
Good post Dan. It is hard to get your (or at least my) head around the seismic shifts that are under way. I think about what I'd do if I were running one of these big media companies right now and have a hard time coming up with answers that are both sensible and have a prayer of working.
Great blog, the near future is going to be very interesting.
Great blog, the near future is going to be very interesting.
Comments on this entry are closed.