Despite the radical change in economic conditions, tracking polls point to the emotional resilience of Americans as the foundation of a recovery

by drm on April 25, 2009

A key factor in our current economic downturn has been the rapid shift of consumer consumption, the deleveraging of household debt and the ensuing decline in business production.

Finding a bottom and starting a recovery will require a resumption of consumer confidence.

A review of a key real-time Index of economic conditions and of current consumer tracking polls suggests that people may be beginning recover from the initial shock of this economic contraction and that their natural resilience is creating a foundation for renewed energy in consumer activity.

To gauge just how significant the shock to consumers has been, it’s useful to review a very striking real-time index of the current economic conditions on the Federal Reserve Bank of Philadelphia web site.

Let the experts explain:

The Aruoba-Diebold-Scotti business conditions index is designed to track real business conditions at high frequency. Its underlying economic indicators (weekly initial jobless claims; monthly payroll employment, industrial production, personal income less transfer payments, manufacturing and trade sales; and quarterly real GDP) blend high- and low-frequency information and stock and flow dynamics. Both the ADS index and this web page are updated as data on the index’s underlying components are released.

The average value of the ADS index is zero. Progressively bigger positive values indicate progressively better-than-average conditions, whereas progressively more negative values indicate progressively worse-than-average conditions. The ADS index may be used to compare business conditions at different times. A value of -3.0, for example, would indicate business conditions significantly worse than at any time in either the 1990-91 or the 2001 recession, during which the ADS index never dropped below -2.0.

The relationship between the data helps to capture the immediate trends that are affecting the way the we feel: how many people are losing their jobs, how much money we’re making and how businesses are doing. And the relative difference between the intensity of these occurrences helps to explain why some periods feel worse than others, even if we are experiencing prosperity at a higher-than-average rate.

Picture 59.png

Looking at the performance of the Index since 2000, you can see just how wide a spread there is between what we have been experiencing and what we’re experiencing now. The Index also captures just how rapid the drop was. The recession at its outset felt like it did in 2001, which despite the social trauma was a fairly mild and quick-turning downturn. Then, last October, the Index fell off a cliff. That experience felt painful and sudden, and it’s easy to see why. All of the measurements of things that make us feel OK — jobs, income, company health — collapsed.

Looking at the Index back to 1960 gives us some more perspective on the dynamics that are affecting our psychology.

First, we’ve had downturns with this significant a human impact at this rapid a velocity in our recent past. The rolling recession of the 1980′s, the time of the great restructuring of American corporate life, went on longer and had periods of equal intensity. The stagflation of the mid-1970′s was even more intense.

However, it’s been a long time since we’ve experienced a downturn of this intensity and magnitude, the Index shows. A couple of generations have entered the work force, are in positions of influence in media, finance and industry. This downturn is like a steam burn: they know they are in pain, but they can’t see the thing that caused it. The feeling is disconcerting and unsettling. It takes a while to adjust.

Picture 58.png

The Index helps to provide some context for a data source that I like to follow: Gallup’s daily tracking polls.

Below are three key consumer sentiment trackers from Gallup: Happiness, Perception of Standard of Living and Consumer Confidence.

The trends show a re-calibrating over the past few months of the way people are feeling about things. The first measure shows that most American’s experience happiness or discontent within a pretty predictable band. Note the slight change in the trend in November and December of last year: in the midst of the worse Holiday season in decades, with job cuts announced every day, the percentage of people experiencing a sense of well-being increased. (I think it was two-part: the end of a difficult year and the promise of a new administration got people walking with a little bounce in their step again.)

Picture 60.pngHappiness and Standard of Living aren’t necessarily directly connected, the trend in the next chart suggests. And, the data suggests a shift in consumer sentiments about their future prospects, as slightly more report confidence that their standard of living is getting better than say it is getting worse.

Picture 62.png

Picture 63.png

This metric is likely connected to the trends indicated by the Aruoba-Diebold-Scotti Business Conditions Index.

Finally, consumer mood has seen an significant uptick since October, with the number of consumers feeling mixed about current economic conditions climbing from close to 10% to 32% and the number of consumers feeling negative about the economy dropping from over 80% to 61%.

I’d characterize this as cautious optimism. And, since the decline in consumer consumption has been a big driver of the economic downturn, a return of consumer confidence will help  boost the economy.

Taken together, the Gallup and A-D-S data suggests that consumers are adjusting to a new intensity of experience and are building an emotional foundation

for continuing back along their normal lives.

Patterns of consumption will be changed, attitudes about debt revised and new engines of economic growth required. But if these trends bear out, the underlying resilience of the American populace will help us work our way out from this difficult time. And, if these trends are solid, they suggest that we’re bumping along the bottom of the emotional consumer cycle, and that people, who are generally happy and stress-free, just want to get back to the business of living.

Related Posts with Thumbnails
Share
  • http://real-url.org/twitted.php?id=1612946415 Twitted by Marketing_Alert

    [...] This post was Twitted by Marketing_Alert [...]

  • http://go-greener.linkedz.info/2009/04/25/despite-the-radical-change-in-economic-conditions-tracking-polls/ Topics about Go-greener » Blog Archive » Despite the radical change in economic conditions, tracking polls …

    [...] drm placed an observative post today on Despite the radical change in economic conditions, tracking polls …Here’s a quick excerptThe rolling recession of the 1980’s, the time of the great restructuring of American corporate life, went on longer and had periods of equal intensity. The stagflation of the mid-1970’s was even more intense. … [...]

  • Tom Cintorino

    That is a lot of data to synthesize and in aggregate could, as you say, be summed up by saying that people are generally optimistic, tired of the doom-n-gloom, and therefore confidence is headed up paralleled by (personal and business) spending – a.k.a. economic recovery.

    Looking for alternative interpretations (its worth noting here that I am an optimist), the A-D-S data from 1960 forward shows each deep-dive followed by an almost as-significant rebound. There is also a “bounce” as the business metrics in combination with emotional survey data try and calibrate themselves to reality. The only similarity to the current “twin-peak” deep-dive is in the early 60s, only it was 2/3s its size. One way to look at the “single” versus “twin-peak” dives is to create a scatter diagram (using the datapoints in the A-D-S graph as shown) and regression line. It will show that unless we soon bounce toward 1.25 range (as in the early 60s), and if the current “bounce” continues to oscillate, that we are at an historic (back to 1960s A-D-S data) low and just skidding along the bottom. If so, of course, the good news is that I did say “bottom”.

    Further, in the Gallup data there is less than two years of data giving us just a few months of annual overlap. Hardly enough to properly evaluate a sufficient amount of seasonality impact. Using the data shown, it may suggest that emotional factors are strong to the positive during spring/summer for obvious reasons. Last year there was a drawn-out leveling off while this year there seems to be an increase from a low. In combination with the positive spring/summer impact on human emotion, there is the fiscal stimulus. Perhaps Keynesian economics are best when in times like these (different discussion), but at some point as we have seen repeatedly throughout history, government meddling in the practices of free economic theory can have an equal disrupting impact as too little oversight has done recently. Therefore, a friction coefficient to a rise in consumer spending (in part due to spring/summer and fiscal stimulus) may be the pending cost of government investment and downsides of too much oversight.

    I am now sufficiently over my head in this discussion, but hopefully contributed by stirring some thought and dialog.

  • http://www.viralhousingfix.com danielrmccarthy

    You make good points, Tom. Floyd Norris looked at similar data in today’s New York Times and paints a picture of a dire economic climate with more pain to come. It’s worth looking at. You’re also right that the Gallup data only covers the recent two years and so missed the kind of historical context that a larger sample would give.

    My focus — and the reason for choosing the more recent data set — is on the change of current consumer sentiment in the face of daunting economic trends. The A-D-S data is a great way to capture the economic zeitgeist. Increasingly, I’m of the opinion that the way out of this financial mess will be in the resilience of American attitudes. This is a sociological phenomenon that has been documented over time, and which is romantically captured as a uniquely American spirit. I’ve always been skeptical of such a phenomenon, but find myself in my interactions with people around the country being very struck by their intent on working through what’s going on. That’s a different feeling about things than I get from my peers in the media industry, who are looking around and seeing the world end.

    So, the juxtaposition that I was looking for was to demonstrate how fast the economic zeitgeist changed, how quickly attitudes declined, and then, how attitudes are beginning to shift. That shift in the face of continued challenges is that shimmer of resilience that I’m struck by.

    Thanks for the comment. I agree with your seasonal assessment. And, I’m not wholly comfortable with all the stimulus and the way its distributed. But it’s what we have. I saw an interesting bit of research from BigResearch yesterday that claimed American’s felt good about things, but also feel like too many decisions are being made by government and those decisions are too far away. Contrast that with Obama’s 65% approval rating and you’ve got a disconnect that it difficult to reconcile.

  • http://www.viralhousingfix.com danielrmccarthy

    You make good points, Tom. Floyd Norris looked at similar data in today’s New York Times and paints a picture of a dire economic climate with more pain to come. It’s worth looking at. You’re also right that the Gallup data only covers the recent two years and so missed the kind of historical context that a larger sample would give.

    My focus — and the reason for choosing the more recent data set — is on the change of current consumer sentiment in the face of daunting economic trends. The A-D-S data is a great way to capture the economic zeitgeist. Increasingly, I’m of the opinion that the way out of this financial mess will be in the resilience of American attitudes. This is a sociological phenomenon that has been documented over time, and which is romantically captured as a uniquely American spirit. I’ve always been skeptical of such a phenomenon, but find myself in my interactions with people around the country being very struck by their intent on working through what’s going on. That’s a different feeling about things than I get from my peers in the media industry, who are looking around and seeing the world end.

    So, the juxtaposition that I was looking for was to demonstrate how fast the economic zeitgeist changed, how quickly attitudes declined, and then, how attitudes are beginning to shift. That shift in the face of continued challenges is that shimmer of resilience that I’m struck by.

    Thanks for the comment. I agree with your seasonal assessment. And, I’m not wholly comfortable with all the stimulus and the way its distributed. But it’s what we have. I saw an interesting bit of research from BigResearch yesterday that claimed American’s felt good about things, but also feel like too many decisions are being made by government and those decisions are too far away. Contrast that with Obama’s 65% approval rating and you’ve got a disconnect that it difficult to reconcile.

  • http://mypage.com/site/blog/2009/04/25/despite-the-radical-change-in-economic-conditions-tracking-polls-point-to-the-emotional-resilience-of-americans-as-the-foundation-of-a-recovery/ Despite the radical change in economic conditions, tracking polls point to the emotional resilience of Americans as the foundation of a recovery « MyPage Builder

    [...] more:  Despite the radical change in economic conditions, tracking polls point to the emotional resilience … Bookmark [...]

  • http://www.viralhousingfix.com danielrmccarthy

    You make good points, Tom. Floyd Norris looked at similar data in today’s New York Times and paints a picture of a dire economic climate with more pain to come. It’s worth looking at. You’re also right that the Gallup data only covers the recent two years and so missed the kind of historical context that a larger sample would give.

    My focus — and the reason for choosing the more recent data set — is on the change of current consumer sentiment in the face of daunting economic trends. The A-D-S data is a great way to capture the economic zeitgeist. Increasingly, I’m of the opinion that the way out of this financial mess will be in the resilience of American attitudes. This is a sociological phenomenon that has been documented over time, and which is romantically captured as a uniquely American spirit. I’ve always been skeptical of such a phenomenon, but find myself in my interactions with people around the country being very struck by their intent on working through what’s going on. That’s a different feeling about things than I get from my peers in the media industry, who are looking around and seeing the world end.

    So, the juxtaposition that I was looking for was to demonstrate how fast the economic zeitgeist changed, how quickly attitudes declined, and then, how attitudes are beginning to shift. That shift in the face of continued challenges is that shimmer of resilience that I’m struck by.

    Thanks for the comment. I agree with your seasonal assessment. And, I’m not wholly comfortable with all the stimulus and the way its distributed. But it’s what we have. I saw an interesting bit of research from BigResearch yesterday that claimed American’s felt good about things, but also feel like too many decisions are being made by government and those decisions are too far away. Contrast that with Obama’s 65% approval rating and you’ve got a disconnect that it difficult to reconcile.