<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Tidbits on ReachLocal</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.viralhousingfix.com/2009/08/19/tidbits-on-reachlocal/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.viralhousingfix.com/2009/08/19/tidbits-on-reachlocal/</link>
	<description>Information, analysis and commentary on media &#38; marketing</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Jan 2012 06:17:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: danielrmccarthy</title>
		<link>http://www.viralhousingfix.com/2009/08/19/tidbits-on-reachlocal/comment-page-1/#comment-820</link>
		<dc:creator>danielrmccarthy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Aug 2009 16:14:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.viralhousingfix.com/?p=1721#comment-820</guid>
		<description>Good question.  Since its inception in 2004, ReachLocal has driven 15M phone leads for clients.  If we assume 40% of the calls happened in the last year (they&#039;ve been growing steadily), then the cost-per-lead would be around $30.  If they drove 60% of the calls in the last year, the cost per lead would be around $17.  My guess is that it is on the higher end.  The metrics are pretty consistent with our own experience using SEM.  The cost for highly-targeted, non-competitive segments will be lower, since there are fewer advertisers.  As some recent research showed, when you are buying search, there is a premium for getting the first position, as click-thru rates drop significantly the further down the list you are.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good question.  Since its inception in 2004, ReachLocal has driven 15M phone leads for clients.  If we assume 40% of the calls happened in the last year (they&#39;ve been growing steadily), then the cost-per-lead would be around $30.  If they drove 60% of the calls in the last year, the cost per lead would be around $17.  My guess is that it is on the higher end.  The metrics are pretty consistent with our own experience using SEM.  The cost for highly-targeted, non-competitive segments will be lower, since there are fewer advertisers.  As some recent research showed, when you are buying search, there is a premium for getting the first position, as click-thru rates drop significantly the further down the list you are.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: danielrmccarthy</title>
		<link>http://www.viralhousingfix.com/2009/08/19/tidbits-on-reachlocal/comment-page-1/#comment-442</link>
		<dc:creator>danielrmccarthy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Aug 2009 11:14:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.viralhousingfix.com/?p=1721#comment-442</guid>
		<description>Good question.  Since its inception in 2004, ReachLocal has driven 15M phone leads for clients.  If we assume 40% of the calls happened in the last year (they&#039;ve been growing steadily), then the cost-per-lead would be around $30.  If they drove 60% of the calls in the last year, the cost per lead would be around $17.  My guess is that it is on the higher end.  The metrics are pretty consistent with our own experience using SEM.  The cost for highly-targeted, non-competitive segments will be lower, since there are fewer advertisers.  As some recent research showed, when you are buying search, there is a premium for getting the first position, as click-thru rates drop significantly the further down the list you are.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good question.  Since its inception in 2004, ReachLocal has driven 15M phone leads for clients.  If we assume 40% of the calls happened in the last year (they&#39;ve been growing steadily), then the cost-per-lead would be around $30.  If they drove 60% of the calls in the last year, the cost per lead would be around $17.  My guess is that it is on the higher end.  The metrics are pretty consistent with our own experience using SEM.  The cost for highly-targeted, non-competitive segments will be lower, since there are fewer advertisers.  As some recent research showed, when you are buying search, there is a premium for getting the first position, as click-thru rates drop significantly the further down the list you are.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dennis Yu</title>
		<link>http://www.viralhousingfix.com/2009/08/19/tidbits-on-reachlocal/comment-page-1/#comment-441</link>
		<dc:creator>Dennis Yu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Aug 2009 09:25:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.viralhousingfix.com/?p=1721#comment-441</guid>
		<description>Dan,&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Great sleuthing on Reach!  Would be interesting to see more detailed numbers-- far beyond the recent Borrell report.  What is the average cost per lead/call by category (dentist, cosmetic surgeon, attorney, etc...)?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Dennis</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dan,</p>
<p>Great sleuthing on Reach!  Would be interesting to see more detailed numbers&#8211; far beyond the recent Borrell report.  What is the average cost per lead/call by category (dentist, cosmetic surgeon, attorney, etc&#8230;)?</p>
<p>Dennis</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic page generated in 0.348 seconds. -->
<!-- Cached page generated by WP-Super-Cache on 2012-02-09 10:55:02 -->

