<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Display advertising is brand advertising?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.viralhousingfix.com/2009/10/14/display-advertising-is-brand-advertising/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.viralhousingfix.com/2009/10/14/display-advertising-is-brand-advertising/</link>
	<description>Information, analysis and commentary on media &#38; marketing</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2010 23:26:31 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: mlillig</title>
		<link>http://www.viralhousingfix.com/2009/10/14/display-advertising-is-brand-advertising/comment-page-1/#comment-861</link>
		<dc:creator>mlillig</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Oct 2009 21:00:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.viralhousingfix.com/?p=2021#comment-861</guid>
		<description>Great article Dan.  &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;You mentioned above, &quot;Unfortunately, the seductiveness of web statistics has driven many people to discount the impact of marketing through multiple channels.&quot;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;That is definitely a true statement.  The whole measurement of the last-clicked ad gets 100% of the conversion credit was the only kind of measurement that online advertisers had.  But that type of measurement is now changing for the better.  Lots of companies that provide online campaign measurement metrics are shifting their focus to developing improved multi-channel tracking capabilities. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;There&#039;s lots of talk out there in the industry about attribution measurement.  Becuase of this new shift, I think we&#039;ll see an uptick in adoption of display as more advertisers will be able to see that their display efforts are driving click lift and conversions for their search efforts.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Matt Lillig&lt;br&gt;Yahoo! Analytics</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great article Dan.  </p>
<p>You mentioned above, &#8220;Unfortunately, the seductiveness of web statistics has driven many people to discount the impact of marketing through multiple channels.&#8221;</p>
<p>That is definitely a true statement.  The whole measurement of the last-clicked ad gets 100% of the conversion credit was the only kind of measurement that online advertisers had.  But that type of measurement is now changing for the better.  Lots of companies that provide online campaign measurement metrics are shifting their focus to developing improved multi-channel tracking capabilities. </p>
<p>There&#39;s lots of talk out there in the industry about attribution measurement.  Becuase of this new shift, I think we&#39;ll see an uptick in adoption of display as more advertisers will be able to see that their display efforts are driving click lift and conversions for their search efforts.</p>
<p>Matt Lillig<br />Yahoo! Analytics</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: danielrmccarthy</title>
		<link>http://www.viralhousingfix.com/2009/10/14/display-advertising-is-brand-advertising/comment-page-1/#comment-863</link>
		<dc:creator>danielrmccarthy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Oct 2009 19:56:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.viralhousingfix.com/?p=2021#comment-863</guid>
		<description>The challenge is that when so much data is available, the instinct is to over-simplify. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The proliferation of content and the ability to drive audience to many different sites has created a huge amount of inventory, and that has helped to drive down the cost of advertising, on the web and then in other media. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Ultimately, the challenge for the marketer is to drive business activity at a lower cost than before. Unfortunately, the seductiveness of web statistics has driven many people to discount the impact of marketing through multiple channels.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The challenge is that when so much data is available, the instinct is to over-simplify. </p>
<p>The proliferation of content and the ability to drive audience to many different sites has created a huge amount of inventory, and that has helped to drive down the cost of advertising, on the web and then in other media. </p>
<p>Ultimately, the challenge for the marketer is to drive business activity at a lower cost than before. Unfortunately, the seductiveness of web statistics has driven many people to discount the impact of marketing through multiple channels.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tjweyer</title>
		<link>http://www.viralhousingfix.com/2009/10/14/display-advertising-is-brand-advertising/comment-page-1/#comment-862</link>
		<dc:creator>tjweyer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Oct 2009 19:49:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.viralhousingfix.com/?p=2021#comment-862</guid>
		<description>I read this post with great interest...  I have been involved with online display advertising in one form or another for 10 years, at the local level and national level.  I always trained my sales reps (and did the same when I was the one selling) to think of a graphical display ad / banner ad as a billboard on a highway.  Consumers WILL see the ad and it WILL have some sort of impact on their future behavior.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The dichotomy has always been that online is the &quot;measurable&quot; medium whereas billboard / TV / radio was not.  These various data points above prove that in many cases - it&#039;s really not, but it doesn&#039;t lessen the value of having online display ads as a portion of an advertiser&#039;s media mix.  The combination of a good visual ad paired with websites that reach a target audience that&#039;s in line with advertiser&#039;s needs will have a positive branding impact for them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I read this post with great interest&#8230;  I have been involved with online display advertising in one form or another for 10 years, at the local level and national level.  I always trained my sales reps (and did the same when I was the one selling) to think of a graphical display ad / banner ad as a billboard on a highway.  Consumers WILL see the ad and it WILL have some sort of impact on their future behavior.</p>
<p>The dichotomy has always been that online is the &#8220;measurable&#8221; medium whereas billboard / TV / radio was not.  These various data points above prove that in many cases &#8211; it&#39;s really not, but it doesn&#39;t lessen the value of having online display ads as a portion of an advertiser&#39;s media mix.  The combination of a good visual ad paired with websites that reach a target audience that&#39;s in line with advertiser&#39;s needs will have a positive branding impact for them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mlillig</title>
		<link>http://www.viralhousingfix.com/2009/10/14/display-advertising-is-brand-advertising/comment-page-1/#comment-509</link>
		<dc:creator>mlillig</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Oct 2009 16:00:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.viralhousingfix.com/?p=2021#comment-509</guid>
		<description>Great article Dan.  &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;You mentioned above, &quot;Unfortunately, the seductiveness of web statistics has driven many people to discount the impact of marketing through multiple channels.&quot;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;That is definitely a true statement.  The whole measurement of the last-clicked ad gets 100% of the conversion credit was the only kind of measurement that online advertisers had.  But that type of measurement is now changing for the better.  Lots of companies that provide online campaign measurement metrics are shifting their focus to developing improved multi-channel tracking capabilities. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;There&#039;s lots of talk out there in the industry about attribution measurement.  Becuase of this new shift, I think we&#039;ll see an uptick in adoption of display as more advertisers will be able to see that their display efforts are driving click lift and conversions for their search efforts.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Matt Lillig&lt;br&gt;Yahoo! Analytics</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great article Dan.  </p>
<p>You mentioned above, &#8220;Unfortunately, the seductiveness of web statistics has driven many people to discount the impact of marketing through multiple channels.&#8221;</p>
<p>That is definitely a true statement.  The whole measurement of the last-clicked ad gets 100% of the conversion credit was the only kind of measurement that online advertisers had.  But that type of measurement is now changing for the better.  Lots of companies that provide online campaign measurement metrics are shifting their focus to developing improved multi-channel tracking capabilities. </p>
<p>There&#39;s lots of talk out there in the industry about attribution measurement.  Becuase of this new shift, I think we&#39;ll see an uptick in adoption of display as more advertisers will be able to see that their display efforts are driving click lift and conversions for their search efforts.</p>
<p>Matt Lillig<br />Yahoo! Analytics</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: danielrmccarthy</title>
		<link>http://www.viralhousingfix.com/2009/10/14/display-advertising-is-brand-advertising/comment-page-1/#comment-508</link>
		<dc:creator>danielrmccarthy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Oct 2009 14:56:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.viralhousingfix.com/?p=2021#comment-508</guid>
		<description>The challenge is that when so much data is available, the instinct is to over-simplify. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The proliferation of content and the ability to drive audience to many different sites has created a huge amount of inventory, and that has helped to drive down the cost of advertising, on the web and then in other media. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Ultimately, the challenge for the marketer is to drive business activity at a lower cost than before. Unfortunately, the seductiveness of web statistics has driven many people to discount the impact of marketing through multiple channels.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The challenge is that when so much data is available, the instinct is to over-simplify. </p>
<p>The proliferation of content and the ability to drive audience to many different sites has created a huge amount of inventory, and that has helped to drive down the cost of advertising, on the web and then in other media. </p>
<p>Ultimately, the challenge for the marketer is to drive business activity at a lower cost than before. Unfortunately, the seductiveness of web statistics has driven many people to discount the impact of marketing through multiple channels.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tjweyer</title>
		<link>http://www.viralhousingfix.com/2009/10/14/display-advertising-is-brand-advertising/comment-page-1/#comment-507</link>
		<dc:creator>tjweyer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Oct 2009 14:49:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.viralhousingfix.com/?p=2021#comment-507</guid>
		<description>I read this post with great interest...  I have been involved with online display advertising in one form or another for 10 years, at the local level and national level.  I always trained my sales reps (and did the same when I was the one selling) to think of a graphical display ad / banner ad as a billboard on a highway.  Consumers WILL see the ad and it WILL have some sort of impact on their future behavior.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The dichotomy has always been that online is the &quot;measurable&quot; medium whereas billboard / TV / radio was not.  These various data points above prove that in many cases - it&#039;s really not, but it doesn&#039;t lessen the value of having online display ads as a portion of an advertiser&#039;s media mix.  The combination of a good visual ad paired with websites that reach a target audience that&#039;s in line with advertiser&#039;s needs will have a positive branding impact for them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I read this post with great interest&#8230;  I have been involved with online display advertising in one form or another for 10 years, at the local level and national level.  I always trained my sales reps (and did the same when I was the one selling) to think of a graphical display ad / banner ad as a billboard on a highway.  Consumers WILL see the ad and it WILL have some sort of impact on their future behavior.</p>
<p>The dichotomy has always been that online is the &#8220;measurable&#8221; medium whereas billboard / TV / radio was not.  These various data points above prove that in many cases &#8211; it&#39;s really not, but it doesn&#39;t lessen the value of having online display ads as a portion of an advertiser&#39;s media mix.  The combination of a good visual ad paired with websites that reach a target audience that&#39;s in line with advertiser&#39;s needs will have a positive branding impact for them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic page generated in 0.546 seconds. -->
<!-- Cached page generated by WP-Super-Cache on 2010-03-14 21:50:19 -->
