Posts tagged as:

AT&T

Our experience with brand service

by drm on July 1, 2009

A couple of weeks ago I ran a short poll on this blog asking whether our experience with customer service had changed during the economic contraction.

The question was prompted by an experience I had with American Express that seemed very contrary to the brand promise of the company.

The results of this admittedly unscientific poll are below:

Do you feel that major brands (like American Express) are providing customer service consistent with their brand promise during this economic contraction?

  • I've never felt like the customer service I experienced was consistent with the brand promise (41%, 12 Votes)
  • I have seen a notable fall-off in customer service. (34%, 10 Votes)
  • Customer service has actually improved ... I can tell that they want to keep my business. (14%, 4 Votes)
  • Customer service is at the same high level I've always experienced (11%, 3 Votes)

Total Voters: 29

Loading ... Loading ...

75% of you seem pretty unimpressed with customer service:  34% feel like customer-service has fallen off recently and another 41% feel like customer service has never been consistent with the brand promises.

That’s a pretty unsatisfactory outcome.

In this period of economic challenges, customer service is a powerful point of differentiation that is within your control.  So much of customer service is about accessibility, culture and attitude.  With all of the communications challenges available to us today, we can create multiple points of contacts with consumers.

Customer service doesn’t mean that you resolve each issue in favor of the person who has reached out.  It does mean that every issue is resolved in a timely and personal fashion.

That way, customer service becomes a foundation element of the customer experience.

My orientation of customer service is rooted in my first experiences in business.  We had a small boutique newsletter and consulting firm that specialized in the impact of technology on the content business.  This is the mid-1980s, after the breakup of AT&T and during a period of innovation and expansion in the microcomputer industry and the business information industry.  All the change was driven by harnessing the power of micro-processors and shifting the channels of distribution for information.

Our business depended on high-value interactions:  A newsletter subscription was about $400 and a report sale was at least $1500.

Every single phone call mattered.

As a result, everyone answered the phone.  Every phone call an opportunity:  to learn some bit of information, to handle an order inquiry and, most importantly, to deal with a customer service issue.

If the phone rang more than 3 times and didn’t get picked up, we knew that we were doing something wrong.

Every person was required to get a name, title, company, address and phone number every time the phone rang.  We put this information into one single database — a rudimentary Professional Pro spreadsheet — and tracked it against orders and renewals.

The essence of our customer experience was engagement, curiosity and resolution.  Every single time.

That’s my expectation from a customer service organization.  At our company, with our 35,000+ customer relationships and the millions of pieces of content that we process and distribute every single month, I hope that we’re able to achieve some of that experience of customer service.  We believe that our culture gives people the opportunity to resolve issues and to feel satisfied with what they’ve been able to do.

Can I attest that we accomplish that consistently?  No.  And the very act of writing this post makes me think about ways that we should set out these expectations more clearly and measure more effectively.

That’s how you improve your customer experience.

Share

{ 0 comments }

The pay for content debate, again

by drm on March 4, 2009

Over the past few weeks there have been a slew of announcements from newspapers as they seek protection from their creditors to restructure, release disappointing earnings and evaluate the long-term viability of new approaches to old-time markets.

Within the context of this relentless bad news, there’s been a renewal of the debate of how to deal with content online.

NewsosaurAlan Mutter, in his blog, presents a two-part series on the need for newspapers to charge for content and some proposals of how to approach the problem.

The comments are worth the read: convictions run high on this count, and many readers have a tremendous amount at stake, both in the new and the old economy.

I was struck by one comment in particular, which speaks to an underlying bias for or against the continuation of traditional journalism in its current form.

Because I have no faith in the blogosphere to replace the vital work of the professional (though admittedly flawed) press, I sincerely hope the traditional media will put a major effort into finding ways to get paid for at least a portion of their valuable content.

An underpinning of our democracy is freedom of information.  A traditional role of journalism is to encourage and abet the flow of information, and to ensure that where information is not flowing it is ferreted out.

The business of newspapers is only partly the business of journalism.  Newspapers are complex institutions with multiple loyalties to shareholders, employees, advertisers, to politicians, to readers and to the general population.  Sometimes the ethics of journalism and the business of newspapering line up and sometimes they don’t.

InterchangeI worked on a development team in the early 1990′s to create a content channel for Ziff-Davis’s online service Interchange (which was subsequently bought by AT&T).  There were tons of bright people building out an interconnected system of content and data that would drive rich channels of information across a multi-tiered subscriber base.

It was the classic walled garden.  It no longer exists.

Look across the web, and the only information that will drive direct consumer support is the high-value, differentiated information that people want.  But it’s not all of the information that those committed to the pursuit of journalism believe is essential to the functioning of a free democracy.

So what is the future of journalism?

Related Posts with Thumbnails
Share

{ 0 comments }