Posts tagged as:

classified advertising

Picture 12.pngGannet’s business gives it great visibility into the health of the local advertising market, making its first quarter earnings call a particularly good barometer of what’s going on in local advertising.

Revenue dropped from $1.7 billion a year ago to $1.4 billion. Ad revenue was down 34% to $722.8 million. Operating income was down 49% from $327.6 million to $166.2 million.

In their earnings call, management was candid and cautious. They have a plan that they are executing in the midst of terrific headwinds.

A few things stood out.

There is no visibility on the business.

Craig Huber – Barclays Capital

You usually have a pretty good sense of how U.S.A. Today is going with forward bookings. I was wondering how that paper is trending with ad revenues in the month of April. And then also could you speak about daily and Sunday circulation volume, what the percent change was in the first quarter and separating out U.S.A. Today?

Craig Dubow (CEO)

Just taking a look as I said a little earlier, the visibility in particular is extremely limited. We are seeing as I mentioned, a bit of leveling as we move forward but I would suggest at this point that April continues to have a very, very limited view as to what we’re seeing at this point.

Classified revenues are down dramatically.

In classified advertising, here too trends we highlighted through February continued into March. Declines in auto, employment and real estate were roughly 39%, 62% and 61% respectively. The exchange rate however, negatively impacted our results in the quarter. If you exclude the impact of currency that would have moderated revenue declines in each of the classified categories I mentioned by an average of about five percentage points.

While this is a cycle, building a multi-platform asset will help the company increase their benefit during the inevitable, but as-yet un-seeable, rebound.

Timothy Stabos – Stabos Asset Management

With the common stock at $3.65, the belief it seems is that you’re not going to get these ad revenues back. As a shareholder, I have my own opinion on that, but I think it’s important for management to go on the record. What percent of this decline in ad revenues in the view of management is secular versus cyclical?

Craig Dubow

We have talked a lot about the cycles that everything is going through. We are I think up front in suggesting that there has been a portion of secular change across the board here and certainly when you look at moving through that, we will then begin to cycle clearly on the real estate side at some point here in the near future or in the future. Let me not term it as near.

But we will see that cycle. And I think there is a combination. The clear message here is why we’re trying to ramp as rapidly as we can on the digital side. We know where our core is. We are trying to make certain that we are going to be on the multi platform opportunity at this point so we can take advantage then from both directions.

Our believe is that if things are leveling a bit, hopefully sometime at the end of the year and beyond, we may begin to see some advertisers poking back into this in some pretty significant ways, but all of that is to come as we look to the future.

Share

{ 7 comments }

The S&P/Case-Shiller Home Price Index was released today and showed continued broad declines in the price of existing single family homes across the US, with 13 of the 20 metro areas showing rates of decline. Overall, prices in the 20-City Composite compiled by Case-Shiller were down 19%.

Picture 1.pngThe decline from the peak of 2006 has been precipitous; the chart showing the percentage decline from the prior year looks like an unscalable cliff face, and the housing industry is sliding down it at a rapid pace.

The three worse markets in terms of annual declines were Phoenix, down 30%, Las Vegas, down 33% and San Francisco, 32%.

The combination of price declines and decreased sales volume has significantly reduced overall marketing spend by real estate agents and companies and has ravaged classified spending.

Classified real estate advertising in newspapers gained from $2.6 billion in 1995 to $4.6 billion in 2006. In the past two years, classified advertising has declined 23% and 38% respectively, bringing real estate advertising to $2.5 billion, or approximately 1995 levels.

As I pointed out in an earlier post, the combination of a sharp decline in home prices and home sales has drastically reduced the total pool of available commission dollars to fund marketing. I estimate that total marketing dollars have dropped from above $8 billion to about $4.5 billion over the past couple of years.

The chart to the right shows the relative lag in timing between the decline in sales volume, the decline in prices and the decline in real estate classifieds. While sales began to slow in 2005, prices continued to rise for a year, buoyed by a strong buying marketing and accessible credit. As prices hit an inflection point driven by the escalating decline in sales, advertising spending began to erode. Currently, all three components are in a sharp decline. As I’ve suggested in other posts, the prices will need to feel low enoughPicture 3.png and stable enough to attract buyers to clear out the excess inventory. This appears to be happening in some markets, such as Florida. The recovery will be slow and challenging.

What does it mean for real estate classified advertising? As I’ve postulated in my Kelsey presentation and other posts, the overall pool of agents with enough money to invest in a strong multi-platform marketing campaign will have shrunk dramatically from the peak in 2006. Advertising will continue to be a meaningful differentiator for leading real estate agents. The challenge for local media players such as ourselves (NCI), is that we’ll need to demonstrate clearly to these agents why our marketing solution is a good value, in terms of time saved, market share won and brand built.

Related Posts with Thumbnails
Share

{ 2 comments }