Posts tagged as:

editor

A couple of months ago, Adam Japko and I sat down with two of our top editors to discuss the impact of social media sharing on the traditional magazine editorial workflow.  The conversation was stimulating and I thought it would be useful to share some of my notes, since the observations from the meeting form a practical framework for implementing a content-sharing model within a traditional magazine team.  (For background on the content-sharing model, you can see this post from last year.)

Diane Carroll is the editor of At Home in Arkansas and Clint Smith is the editor of Atlanta Homes & Lifestyles. Both have been at the forefront of integrating social media sharing into the day-to-day routine of their magazines.

The work of their teams has contributed to significant increases in web and Facebook activity around the brand.

Our conversation focused on what changes were necessary to execute the social media sharing and about what impact the sharing has had on their market presence.

The Conversation:

Diane opened the discussion by talking about how expanding the social media channels for At Home in Arkansas has changed the way she thinks about people and projects in her market.

She related an example where she was talking with a design resource in her market who wanted to get coverage in the magazine.

In the past, a limited inventory of editorial pages would have prevented her from giving this resource coverage, Diane shared.

With the addition of social media channels, there are multiple ways to share information about this resource with her audience: creating a blog post, doing a Facebook update on the fan page, and, in this instance, inviting the resource to do a guest post for the At Home blog. The resource came through with “a really great post,” Diane shared, that was interesting and useful.

The social media outlets that At Home and Atlanta H&L have developed are big benefits, Clint and Diane agreed, creating an entirely new way of distributing information, creating an interactive and energetic face for the brand and building their brand presence broader in the market. A simple act like updated the Facebook fan page keeps people very engaged, they observed.

The key to integrating social media into the overall workflow is improved long-range planning and execution of the editorial calendar.

Clint and Diane are experienced, seasoned editors, so it was interesting to discover that both of them had created the bandwidth for executing their social media programs by leveraging and improving their execution of an old magazine tool – the editorial calendar.

The focus was two-fold: improving the execution of the long-range features in the magazine editorial calendar, so that they weren’t racing to get pieces finished right at deadlines; and creating an editorial calendar for the social media content, so that they had a clear expectation of what work would get done when by whom.

The first task was to improve upfront planning. Both editors said that their upfront planning and execution on the print issue had improved as they had increased their social media activities. Without being explicit, it was clear that both Diane and Clint had used improvement of the existing processes in order to create the time resources needed to execute their social media plans.

The second task was to make the social media activity more routine. This required taking the same planning approach to social media as was used for the print issues.

Both At Home and Atlanta Homes & Lifestyles have created weekly social media content schedules.

These schedules are designed to achieve several goals:

  • Share all of the content in the issue through the social media channels;
  • Keep a regular flow of content on the brand blog and Facebook pages;
  • Increase interaction with other bloggers in their topic area and market;
  • Increase engagement with the community around their brand.

At Home has structured is weekly calendar around topics:

  • Monday: General post
  • Tuesday & Thursday: Share content from the latest magazine issue. This can be a Room of the Week, or a fashion segment, or a design project.
  • Wednesday: Recruit a guest blog, typically from someone who has been featured in the magazine;
  • Friday: Friday Favorites, a list of links to other blogs and comments that the staff found interesting during the previous week.

Altanta Home & Lifestyle has addressed the structure of its social media sharing by assigning a specific day of the week to different members of the content team. On that day, the team member is responsible for sharing something of value and interest on the blog and the Facebook page

This “staff blogger” schedule has helped to take the anxiety out of trying to make sure some content is being created each day. It also has the benefit of being predictable for the online audience; over time, a reader will notice that one of their favorites posts every Thursday, for example.

Creating a social media schedule shifts the focus and energy of the content teams, both Clint and Diane observed. One change is that the teams begin to look to other bloggers more. They’ve discovered that bloggers have an identity in the market much like top architects and interior designers. By bringing the bloggers into the umbrella of the brand, it increased the magazine’s presence.

Our discussion closed with some observations about the impact of social sharing on the market.

Clint and Diane commented that the “sense of connectedness” was  different. Things are more interactive: they get comments and ideas from a community that is enormously positive.

As editors, they are seeing more and more overlaps among the ways that they distribute information, and are thinking about new ways to integrate things.

In order to continue to draw benefit from this social sharing activity, the editorial teams would benefit from increased access to the results that they are driving, both in terms of audience to specific posts and sections of the web site, as well as the relative value of this audience to any advertising customers.

In the future, the editorial and sales teams will also need to coordinate the amount of audience that needs to get driven into specific sections of the web site and towards specific customer groups, so that the potential number of conversions to client activity is lined up with the expectations of the clients.

Conclusion:

An editorial team needs to implement four steps in order to increase the consistency and effectiveness of their social media sharing program.

  1. Assess and improve traditional planning and workflow:
    Many editorial teams can create incremental time by being more structured in their long-range planning and in creating their larger features with a longer lead time.
  2. Set specific monthly goals for your social media content
    1. Feature magazine content in individual posts
    2. Guest bloggers
    3. Featured blogs and comments
    4. Online-only features
    5. Community engagement
    6. Traffic/audience
    7. Fans
  3. Set up a weekly content plan
    1. Establish a social media content schedule
    2. Assign specific elements or days to individual staffers
    3. Communicate content schedule to entire team
    4. Have monthly meeting to review social media assignments and results
  4. Track results & feedback
  • Share/Bookmark

{ 3 comments }

Last week in Denver, we held a product design meeting with a group of publishers, editors and designers from our regional Home Design magazines.

The team brought an experienced perspective into the meeting about the kind of impact integrating interactive and social media tools into their business process can have. Over the past 9 months, this group of regional magazines have increased their web distribution by more than 100%, have grown interactive revenues from less than 5% to about 20% of overall advertising revenue and have developed interactive footprints that are close to the size of their print distribution base by growing Fan Pages, building Twitter followings and working their blogs. (I’ve written about some of the success we’ve experienced in posts about the content-sharing paradigm.)

The focus of the meeting was to review some basic wireframes and page designs for our new interactive publishing platform. We’ve made the decision to leverage open source software — Drupal and WordPress — to create highly flexible and content-driven presences for the brands.

The conversation was really exciting. I could see the leaders of each brand thinking in concrete and practical terms about what they needed in the new tools and how they were going to deploy them in order to continue to grow their interaction with consumers and the value they delivered to advertisers.

As we described how implementing better developed tagging systems would allow us to present associated content that would be interesting to the consumer, and to serve up advertising that would be tightly related to the content, a number of questions arose.

The first question was about editorial independence. Will we have to tag articles to benefit certain advertisers? Will we have to write about the advertisers? Does this functionality blur the line between editorial and advertising?

An easy way to explain this functionality was to point to Google’s natural search and paid search results. The online consumer is trained to recognized one set as paid and one set as unpaid. The same goes for this kind of relationship. The advertising units will be clearly identified as advertising, and will be in a different format than the text; the ad queue will simply serve up ads in relation to the editorial tagging.

Another clarifying realization for the team was that less than 20% of the visits to their sites came through the home. The most important page design was the “landing page,” and more than 90% of the time that landing page was a specific blog post or article or professional directory page. A second clarifying realization was that each landing page needed to be simple and direct, and that we needed to reduce the number of options that we gave the consumer, so that we could help them find the the facets of our content library that would be most valuable to them.

If you want to build traffic, we concluded, you need to distribute pieces of content frequently and continuously. A piece of content could be marketed through your social graph a number of times over a month, and in several different ways.

A good example we developed was using the web distribution to promote a specific feature in the next issue of the magazine. Over the period of four weeks, you could share as many as 10 pieces of content from the feature. How? Share different photographs from the photo shoot. Share some tidbits you discover while researching the topic. Share some interesting quotes from an interview that you do. Share the direction that you are taking while you’re writing the draft. Share some of the comments you get from your editor. Then, when the issue goes to press, share what you really like about the finished piece.

This kind of content sharing model could generate 500 to 1000 visits to the web site, in advance of the production of the article itself. When the article is published you have group of readers who are waiting for it, and who will probably consume it online and in print.

Mid-way through the session, we stopped and asked everyone to write the question that was at the top of their minds on a piece of paper.

Here is a sampling of some of the questions:

  • Who will have time to create all of this great content?
  • How will we get it all done?
  • What is the single most important thing we can do on a daily basis to head in this new direction?
  • Are editors to redirect their thinking for magazine content so the content will provide rich links and tags?
  • How will the magazine team work together to accomplish this in a manner that is organized and cohesive?

I explained a basic tenet: We don’t have anymore time in the month. So, if we want to do something different, we have to eliminate something that we are doing now.

How does that translate to the new content workflow?

Calculate how many hours it is going to take to execute the content-sharing plan that you develop for your team. Then, calculate how many hours it takes to produce an editorial page from scratch. In order to find the time for content-sharing, we will have to figure out how to take work that is produced from our social graph and use it to create interesting content in the print magazine.

Won’t that cannibalize the print product?

To answer that question, we were able to point to the tracking each team had of how many people access a specific article or post on the web: rarely did that number exceed 100, even when the overall traffic to the site was over 15,000 unique users.

The editor of At Home in Arkansas, who has had the benefit of several discussions around this approach, outlined to the staff how her team had replaced two pages in the magazine with content that was created as part of their content-sharing process.

I was  impressed. This group of ‘traditional’ editors and publisher had taken the leap into the world of social media and were experiencing the energy and engagement that the new world provided. Those incremental experiences gave them the context to imagine entirely new workflows that created different kinds of value for the market. They were making the shift from thinking about content in a linear process to thinking about knowledge as an asset that could be distributed in multiple forms and through multiple channels. They didn’t feel daunted and they didn’t feel like they need to reinvent the world. They knew they needed to learn some new things, and that it was going to come in fits and starts, but as I listened to them, I could see an entirely new approach to their market developing. It was exciting.

  • Share/Bookmark

{ 2 comments }

Where Jay Rosen shows me why, where & how I am wrong

December 1, 2009

Saturday evening, sitting through previews at the 9:30 showing of Pirate Radio (not recommended, btw), I checked the Twitter stream and was struck by a strong Tweet from @jayrosen_nyu.
Rosen, for those of you who aren’t touched by his wide-reaching social graph, is a professor of journalism at NYU, as well as an early and active [...]

  • Share/Bookmark
View Comments Read the full article →

The discussion around content shifts to a curation model

November 19, 2009

This summer, I did several posts about the shift that I believe needs to take place in traditional publishing workflows in order to adapt to the new web environment and stake out a strong position serving online communities. At the core of this shift is the concept of Sharing, distinct from the traditional linear publishing [...]

  • Share/Bookmark
View Comments Read the full article →

Jon Fine leaves Business Week

November 19, 2009

The FineOnMedia blog yesterday had a short interview with the new editor of BusinessWeek, who talked a little about his approach to his new position.
Today, Jon Fine tweeted that he was leaving BusinessWeek.
Of course, Jon hasn’t been writing the FineonMedia blog for the past several months, as he’s been off on a sabbatical, traveling around [...]

  • Share/Bookmark
View Comments Read the full article →

How the content-sharing model drove unique visits 23% in two months

September 5, 2009

Between June and August, we increased web traffic to our eight local home design sites by 23% without spending an extra cent on Search Engine Marketing, changing our web marketing strategy, altering our print approach or targeting specific traffic gains.
We accomplished the increase simply by adopting a content-sharing model and increasing our competencies with social [...]

  • Share/Bookmark
View Comments Read the full article →

Google & Twitter & Facebook, Oh my: Does the organization of content change?

April 4, 2009

Twitter and Facebook are organizing people and content in ways that can disintermediate Google.

Related Posts with Thumbnails
  • Share/Bookmark
View Comments Read the full article →