Posts tagged as:

Floyd Norris

I was reminded this week of a primary premise in evolutionary psychology: we’re genetically programmed to emphasize information about danger and minimize information about pleasure.

This is a gross simplification of interesting science, but is a useful overlay to the confluence of economic statistics and contradictory commentary in recent weeks.

In today’s New York Times, the pragmatic Floyd Norris makes the argument that data is pointing to a strong economic recovery, even while conventional wisdom suggests that we’re mired in a “new normal” of stagnant performance.

Norris has staked out a niche is letting numbers do his talking. In the column, he points to several statistical developments that suggest many experts are downplaying the positive. One example he cites is the March employment report.

Employment is a lagging indicator. Employers can be slow to cut back when business turns down, and slow to rehire when it picks up. It stands to reason that when employers cut back sharply — as happened in this cycle — they will have to rehire faster than if they had been slow to fire, as was true in the two previous downturns.

I looked back at the recoveries after seven recessions from 1950 through 1982 and found that, on average, such a strong three-month performance of the household survey, defined as a gain of at least 0.8 percent in the total number of existing jobs, came seven months after the recession had ended, with a range of two to 13 months.

If the 2007-9 recession ended in August, as the index of coincident indicators would seem to indicate, the lag this time will have been seven months.

Mark Perry of Carpe Diem presented the trending of initial jobless claims since 1974 in a recent post. The chart is one point in an ongoing argument that Perry has been building that we’re experiencing a real recovery in the economy.

claims.jpg

Perry consolidates his 10 primary points in a post on The Enterprise Blog. He characterizes this as a period of “solid and sustained economic expansion.”

The positive proof points are wide-ranging: manufacturing activity up, restaurant activity rebounding, manufacturing accelerating, job growth increasing. (Perry points out that very few people have reported on the fact that private-sector employment increased by 1.1 million jobs in the first three months of 2010.)

The consensus of most economists is that the Great Recession ended sometime around June 2009. In that case, we are now nine months into an economic recovery, and the economic data and reports summarized here all point to a recovery that is real and sustainable. While this rebound may not be quite as strong as other post-recession expansions of the past by some measures, there is at least now unmistakable evidence that the recession ended last year, the U.S. and world economies and financial markets have recovered and are gaining momentum almost daily, and there are no signs on the economic horizon of a double-dip recession.

The recovering economy was a theme in a conversation I had with one of my key executives last week.

“Don’t expect your customers to recognize that the market is turning,” I said. “They’ve been burned by the dramatic drop in the market, and won’t believe any improvement is going to last until it’s well underway.”

Acknowledging this lag in human perception is an important part of managing your own focus and energy. In this case, our observation translates into a specific sales approach: Be positive, emphasize the benefit of your service, and keep encouraging customers to regain the hope that accompanies investments in marketing, because there is a shift in the way their prospects and customers are seeing the world.

From the overall perspective of the economy, it’s difficult for people to imagine a strong recovery that doesn’t incorporate some of the activity that drove the housing bubble — high levels of construction and resale home activity.

The economic recovery is likely going to incorporate a “new normal in real estate” and a continuing correction in personal and corporate balance sheets. What is clear is that the overall economy has sufficient scale to mitigate the drag of these trends.

While the crashing of the housing bubble was highly disruptive, in the end it has only resulted in the elimination of about 2.3 million jobs. As households re-form and housing inventories gets worked off, new construction will return to the new homes and multi-family markets. The characteristics of this construction will be different: few high-volume (and high margin) tract developments and high-end rental and condominium buildings, and more custom and mid-range projects.

This is how it feels to recover from a bad blow. You need a moment to believe that you’re not about to get hit again, and when you go about your business, you keep looking over your shoulder, thinking that something bad is going to happen again.

Like my mom said, dust yourself off and get moving.

Share

{ 3 comments }

The employment news on Friday was heartening and assorted media outlets are heralding the beginning of the end for the recession. The New York Times on its front cover this morning made the first stab at a hagiography of the Great Recession, lauding the Washington brains that have pulled our country back from the brink following the Lehman bankruptcy. (Their redemption is made even more dramatic by their earlier mistakes — a Paul-on-the-road-to-Damascus conversion that will ensure the future of capitalism, in the Time’s emerging lore.)

Whatever the perils of daily journalism, the NY Times has carved out a leading niche for itself with information-packed graphics that tell stories with breadth and ingenuity.

A package of graphs and charts neatly summarized the labor picture in July: a 9-month tide of increasingly rapid job cuts ebbed in July. I was struck by the relative difference in unemployment level by education: the rate for people who have not completed high school was nearly four times higher than people with a bachelor’s degree or higher. This was the biggest demographic gap in employment cited among the assorted statistics on the page.

The New York Times > Business > Image > The Labor Picture in July.jpg

Working through the paper, I came to Floyd Norris’ Saturday column, where he digs into the numbers around a specific topic or issue.

Norris took a look at the 10-year trend in employment, observing that from 1999 to 2009 only 121,000 net jobs have been created in the private sector. Over the decade, the manufacturing sector experienced a 3.7% decline in jobs. Retail trade was down slightly. The highest areas of growth were in management & technical consulting, computer systems design, health care and food services & drinking places.

The numbers paint a picture of a changing economy, with increases in skilled work. The impact of the change was obscured somewhat during the housing bubble because of the increase in construction opportunities. But the profile of industry is in the midst of a dynamic change.

This change has occurred during the slowest period of net growth in private sector employment during the 1950′s. The implication is that as we experience this change in economic profile, competition for jobs increases as the number of jobs per employable person declines.

employment 10 yrs.jpg

A clear conclusion? Education in general, and the development of specialized skills in specific, increase the potential for employment.

So, how have we done in terms of creating opportunities for education in order to transition the work force and improve our ability to drive growth in new and emerging professional sectors?

Here’s a summary of education attainment from the National Center for Education Statistics

Between 1971 and 2000, the percentage of 25- to 29-year-olds who had completed a bachelor’s degree or higher increased from 17 to 29 percent; however, the rate in 2008, at 31 percent, showed no measurable difference from the rate in 2000. [Emphasis added] Between 1971 and 2008, the percentage who had attained a bachelor’s degree or higher increased from 19 to 37 percent for Whites, from 7 to 20 percent for Blacks, and from 5 to 12 percent for Hispanics. Between 1990 and 2008, the percentage of Asians/Pacific Islanders who had attained a bachelor’s degree or higher increased from 42 to 58 percent, although most of this increase (11 percentage points) occurred between 1995 and 2000. Between 2000 and 2008, there was no measurable difference in the percentage of Asians/Pacific Islanders who had attained a bachelor’s degree or higher. Between 1971 and 2008, the gap favoring Whites over Blacks widened from 12 to 17 percentage points, and the gap favoring Whites over Hispanics widened from 14 to 25 percentage points. Between 1990 and 2008, the gap favoring Asians/Pacific Islanders over Whites widened from 16 to 21 percentage points.

The United States made a concerted effort to drive educational attainment after World War II, and the introduction of social programs during the 1960′s and 1970′s raised the level of education across the population. One can argue that the commitment to education investment helped to drive the productivity explosion that powered our economy during the 1980′s and 1990′s.

We have stagnated since. Productivity is relatively flat, even as the economy has experienced artificial growth. And educational attainment has stagnated as well.

This presents a challenging problem for our society as a whole, and the Obama administration in particular. In order to improve employment, we need to re-charge the investment in education with a clear focus on giving individuals — of all races — access to the specialized skills that will allow them to participate in innovation in developing industries. This investment needs to be made during a period of low growth, which will require government subsidy.

Experts in education and social development point to three or four key factors for childhood success: nutrition, social stability and access to education.

Looking at the focus of our government initiatives, one’s only left to wonder whether by tilting at the big windmills of Health and Credit and Industry, we’re missing the opportunity to build the kind of grassroots successes that can transform our country.

Related Posts with Thumbnails
Share

{ 5 comments }