Posts tagged as:

reporter

Yesterday we announced that our company,  Network Communications, Inc. , had opened conversations with its creditors in order to restructure its balance sheet.  The  development was reported in Business Week and has appeared in numerous news outlets across the web.

The Business Week reporter did a balanced job in describing the situation.  I think one quote sums it up pretty well.

“It’s not a company with a fundamentally broken business model,” McCarthy said. “It’s a company that’s gone through a radical adjustment in size.”

I’m not going to comment on the restructuring process.  A lot of media companies, such as  Reader’s Digest and Freedom Communications,  have gone through restructurings the last two years, emerging successfully as viable businesses with manageable capital structures.

Right now we’re focusing on communicating clearly with our core constituents about what the announcement means for our business.  The short answer is, It’s business as usual.    NCI is in the enviable position of generating more than enough cash to fund its day-to-day operations.

To help spread that message, we sent out copies of our press release and a detailed Q&A to our employees and business partners.  I’ve held a series of webinars to review the materials and address any specific questions.  We’re also reaching out to our key vendors and customers.

I’ve also focused on another message:  Our future is what we make of it.

The difficult market conditions of the past two years have driven us to be more disciplined, more resourceful and more innovative.  This approach has borne tangible business results:  We have expanded our customer relationships, we have built new products, we have strengthened existing products and we have managed in such a way that we’ve been able to sustain our business model.  We’ve been able to do this because of the remarkable focus and commitment of the people who make a difference every day:  The employees and independent distributors associated with the company.

Right now we are facing two basic facts.  Unquestionably, an economic recovery is underway.  Unquestionably, our customers have been shocked by the changes in their business and are reluctant to increase their marketing spend.

To rebuild our business, we need to help resolve the contradiction between those two facts.  We can do this three ways:

  • We have to be in front of our customers and help them see that market has improved enough for them to feel confident that they will get a return on increasing their marketing spend;
  • We have to be fluent in explaining why our traditional businesses continue to provide value to our customers, in terms of visibility, leads and business results.
  • And we have to be energized in showing our customers how our innovative new services, particularly in Internet and social media marketing, can give them powerful ways to expand their brand footprint and build their business.

Executing on these three activities is the most important thing that we can do right now.  That is how we will make our future.

A note:  I have closed comments on this post because of the sensitive nature of this dialog.  If you have any questions you can e-mail me at dmccarthy@nci.com.
  • Share/Bookmark

{ Comments on this entry are closed }

In the halls of a company I ran about 10 years ago, I was joking with one of our senior executives about creating titles for different functions that would reflect the kinds of activity that people were actually doing. “Content generators” was one solution that was thrown out, just as one of our most senior editors came around the corner. He’d heard, but he said nothing, and walked by with a sideways glance.

6A563748-D7A5-4A3C-BC39-04434934D9E0.jpgMy kidding-around came off as callous and mercenary, I suspect.

In today’s chaotic media climate, the recasting and renaming of roles is no longer jest: it’s an important element of adapting process to the new realities of content creation and consumption.

Just that word — content — has vastly different connotations from the word that has always been a sacrosanct reflection of art and science — editorial.

Folio posted an article online earlier this month looking at some changes in the way different publishers are organizing their content teams.

The article reflects some ambivalence, from the distressing illustration (pictured here) showing straight-jacketed staffers being pinched between a giant thumb and forefinger, to the discussion of several companies consolidating content teams across loosely related brands in order to help drive cost efficiency.

While these consolidations have always been a feature of economic downturns, a shift towards different content production skills is something new and promising.

Staff structure isn’t the only thing that’s changed. New hires are now required to have a broader skill set, viewing all content as multi-platform. Everything Channel deploys more junior editors on the front lines, who have taken on responsibilities that in the past were handled by a managing editor, assistant managing editor or executive editor.

“Their editing skills, technical skills and packaging skills have to be to a higher level,” Demarzo says, citing assistant managing editor Chad Bernstein, a former healthcare reporter in control of back-end packaging, who now covers the public sector. “Today, the content team inside Everything Channel is, for lack of a better description, a services arm. Our goal is to service the different P&Ls in the organization.”

This ability to create and package content across multiple media is at the core of re-purposing what have traditionally been siloed and expensive processes at magazines.

The dramatic downturn at magazines have hurt everyone on their staffs. But the emergence of a broader skill set around content creation portends the ability to provide the kind of engaging and multi-platform experiences that consumers are currently looking for…and getting…on the web.

  • Share/Bookmark

{ 3 comments }

Who will know what the news is when the newspapermen are gone?

May 10, 2009

A couple of op-ed pieces in the NY Times looks at a future without news gathering organizations.

Related Posts with Thumbnails
  • Share/Bookmark
View Comments Read the full article →